2. ANS Nuclear Cafe - "We Were Once Terrified of Fire, Too"
Steven B. Krivit notes: "The undercurrent of fear affects all matters related to this [nuclear energy] industry. It must be addressed. Doing so requires examining the risks and consequences of nuclear energy and comparing it to other energy technologies, for none is perfect." And Dr. Krivit goes on to demonstrate: "Clearly, the fears about nuclear energy are based on perceptions, imagined or engineered, and not on the consequences of actual events."
3. Is the nuclear renaissance in Texas toast? At Idaho Samizdat there are no rose colored glasses. Tough times change prospects for new reactors.
In 2007, Texas was the place to be for working on the nuclear renaissance in the U.S. Ambitious plans created a boom-type atmosphere in the state, as three utilities announced they would build a total of six new reactors, two of them at a greenfield location.
Yet today four of the reactors are no longer likely to be completed in the next decade—if ever—and two more are looking at a prolonged construction schedule that could put revenue service well past 2020. Is nuclear energy riding off into the sunset in the Lone Star state?
4. Atomic Power Review - Will Davis gives his readers some background on TEPCO's most recent analysis showing that there was in fact no hydrogen blast at No. 2 plant. If that's true, what got reported at that time?
5. Yes Vermont Yankee - Vermont Energy Plan: Little Time to Comment, No Time to Review
The Energy Plan for "Vermont without Vermont Yankee," requested by Governor Shumlin, is being rushed through the approval process. Meredith Angwin shows the glaring inconsistencies about greenhouse gases, and she is amused that the plan has caused a tiff between Shumlin and his VPIRG supporters. The bottom line: This isn't a plan. It's a set of goals---with no way to achieve them.
6. Neutron Economy - In response to a reader comment, Steve Skutnik explores whether spent fuel repository capacity is limited by physical or political limits and the implications of this on nuclear waste management.
7. Nuclear Power Talk - Gail Marcus points out the difficulties of comparing emissions from coal and gas in regards to effect on climate change as a reminder of the fact that there are no perfect solutions to complex situations. Every energy supply option has some benefits and some drawbacks.
NBF - we will notice that it is easier to compare coal and natural gas on other kinds of air pollution. Coal has more air pollution and more of an impact on health.
8. Nextbigfuture - India's government repeats that they expect to have 20,000 MW nuclear capacity on line by 2020 and 63,000 MW by 2032.
9. Nextbigfuture - Russia presses ahead with new nuclear ice breaker and floating nuclear reactors
The new reactor model will be based around the RITM-200 pressurized water reactor, a design developed by OKBM Afrikantov that integrates some main components into the reactor vessel and produces 55 MWe for the motor-driven propellor. The same design is foreseen as being incorporated in floating power plants. It would operate on fuel enriched to less than 20% uranium-235 and require refuelling every seven years over a 40-year lifespan
10. Nextbigfuture - Kazakhstan will pause in the develop of uranium production at 20,000 tons per year until uranium prices stabilize and rise again.
11. Canadian Energy Issues - Climate change and nuclear proliferation: how to fix both
A recent article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists discussed the urgent issue of climate change and how mankind can act decisively and coherently to deal with it. It dismisses nuclear as proliferation prone. Steve Aplin dissects this rationale, and finds it weak and tendentious.
If you liked this article, please give it a quick review on ycombinator or StumbleUpon. Thanks